QuickField

A new approach to field modelling

Main >> Applications >> Sample problems >> Microstrip transmission line simulation

# Microstrip transmission line

QuickField simulation example

A shielded microstrip transmission line consists of a substrate, a microstrip, and a shield.

Problem Type
Plane-parallel problem of electrostatics.

Geometry

The transmission line is directed along z-axis, its cross section is shown on the sketch. The rectangle ABCD is a section of the shield, the line EF represents a conductor strip.

Model depth Lz = 1 m.

Given
Relative permittivity of air ε = 1;
Relative permittivity of substrate ε = 10.

Determine the capacitance of a microstrip transmission line.

Solution
There are several different approaches to calculate the capacitance of the line:

• To apply some distinct potentials to the shield and the strip and to calculate the charge that arises on the strip;
• To apply zero potential to the shield and to describe the strip as having constant but unknown potential and carrying the charge, and then to measure the potential that arises on the strip.

Both these approaches make use of the equation for capacitance:

C = q / U.

Other possible approaches are based on calculation of stored energy of electric field. When the voltage is known:

C = 2·W / U²,

and when the charge is known:

C = q ² / 2·W

Experiment with this example shows that energy-based approaches give little bit less accuracy than approaches based on charge and voltage only. The first approach needs to get the charge as a value of integral along some contour, and the second one uses only a local value of potential, this approach is the simplest and in many cases the most reliable.

Results

Potential distribution in microstrip transmission line: Theoretical result* (model depth L = 1 m.) C = 178.074 pF. Approach 1 C = 177.83 pF (99.8%) Approach 2 C = 178.47 pF (100.2%) Approach 3 C = 177.33 pF (99.6%) Approach 4 C = 179.61 pF (100.8%)

See the Elec1_1.pbm and Elec1_2.pbm problems for the 1,3 approaches and the 2,4 approaches respectively.

Reference
* Ostergaard, D. F. (1987). Adapting available finite element heat transfer programs to solve 2-D and 3-D electrostatic field problems. Journal of Electrostatics, 19(2), 151–164. 